|
|
||
| DUI Developments |
|---|
| Non-Alcohol (Drug) DUI |
|
It is illegal to drive while impaired by any ingested substance, not just alcohol. Subpart (a) of California's principal DUI statute deliberately includes drugs other than alcohol in its definition:
"It is unlawful for any person who is under the influence of any alcoholic beverage or drug, or under the combined influence of any alcoholic beverage and drug, to drive a vehicle. . . . "
– Vehicle Code § 23152
The driver is guilty of DUI if he/she drives while impaired by any drug, even prescription medications prescribed by the driver's doctor. It is the driver's responsibility to drive only while not impaired by drugs. (The driver taking prescription drugs may have a defense, however, if the impairment resulted from an usual side effect that could not be reasonably anticipated.)
No Per Se Rule for DrugsSubpart (b) of section 23152, which establishes that a driver with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .08% or greater is per se guilty of DUI applies only to alcohol intoxication. That is, there is no per se rule where the driver is suspected of being impaired by drugs other than alcohol. Instead, the prosecutor must prove the driver's guilt by testimony that he/she was driving/behaving in a manner suggesting chemical impairment, buttressed, if available, by evidence from a blood or urine test showing the presence in the suspect's system of a drug with the potential to cause impairment.
Depending on the drug in question and the facts of the case, because there is no per se rule to contend with, a drug-related DUI charge can be easier to defend against than an alcohol-related charge. |
| Further DUI Concepts |
|---|
| Why You Need Us | |
|---|---|
|
|
The DUI Checkpoint
DUI checkpoints operate under a different rationale than an ordinary traffic stop. ( . . . more)
|